Showing posts with label steampunk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label steampunk. Show all posts

Friday, May 31, 2013

Charles Worth inspired gown

The last thing that I made for Steampunk World's Fair was a gown inspired by this astonishing creation by Charles Worth:
images from the incredible online Worth & Mainbocher exhibit from the Museum of the City of New York. 
This is by far the most ambitious project I have ever attempted. The two things that I love most about this design are butterfly train (because butt bows) and the asymmetrical drape in the front overskirt. This project clearly calls for some amazing fabric, and I lucked into some in a serious way. I found this fabric at an interior designer's shop. He was selling a bolt end (approximately 5 yards) of this embroidered silk for ... wait for it... $50. Yes, please!

I wanted to feature this fabric, so after some fussing around, I decided to make the drape and the train out of it. The underskirt was a bronze-y colored silk skirt from a previous costume. I removed the ruffle from that skirt and used some of that fabric and a few remaining scraps to create the bodice.

The Drape
I started by drafting the drape. This was my very first draped pattern, so I was very nervous. It took a while and I had to study the reference photos very carefully (luckily the exhibit features and incredible zoom function). In the end, I settled on this. From the back, it looks very strange, but I knew it would always be covered by the train.





I marked the muslin up and then used it for my pattern. Here's a rough sketch of what that looked like.

back drape diagram

front drape diagram
Clearly, these are just rough guides. If you are interested in make a similar drape, you will need to drape in on a form or on a person, but this should give you an idea about how to start.

Here are some shots of the finished drape. Notice that I left the selvage edge unhemmed as an homage to Worth (also plus because lazy).




The Train
Then I used Truly Victorian's Butterfly Train pattern to finish the bustled skirt. I was running a little short of the embroidered silk, so I made the following changes to the pattern:

  1. Narrowing the train by omitting the side panels. 
  2. Choosing the shortest pattern length and shortening that by an extra 9"
I also lined the train with a contrasting brass silk. I didn't want the embroidery to snag on anything as I walked and I wanted the poufs to have maximum volume.

This train using hooks and eyes to attach to the garment, and it took a little trial and error to figure out where out them. The website suggests that the train is hooked to the outside of the bodice (this is not confirmed in the sample photo) and the written directions suggest hooking the train to an underskirt (which is what I started with). Hooking the train to a skirt worked fine while I was working on the dress form, but I eventually hooked the train to the inside of my bodice. More on that decision later.

Here's the train hooked to the underskirt:

The train went together smoothly, even with my changes. It's really just a series of fabric folding, not a lot of complicated sewing, and the results were pretty stunning.

The Bodice (in which I do everything the hard way)
In theory, I used the Truly Victorian 1892 Ball Gown Bodice. I say "in theory" because I made some serious alterations to change the back closure from buttons to a laced closure, to accomodate the bustle, and to give the back of the bodice an elongated back point.

After the extensive changes I made to the bodice, I came to realize that all of the Truly Victorian ball gown bodices are all essentially the same pattern. If you are going to have to make big changes to the pattern or if you are going to have a sleeveless gown, it really doesn't matter which pattern you choose. All these patterns are the same basic 5 pattern pieces. There are subtle differences for closures, neck lines, and bustles. You will save yourself a lot of time if you want something exactly like or very close to one of these designs, but if you are going to be making changes, I'm not sure it's going to matter which one you start with.

1892 Ball Gown
1885 Bodice
1879
1881

After making five ("yes, just the five") muslins to get the fit right, I was ready to make the final version.  I followed this fantastic blog's advice about how to do a layered bodice. I started with the lining layer, and added the boning. I finished the top and bottom edges with bias binding before attaching the outer layer.



Interior of the Worth gown, for comparison



This make sense if you are planning to tack ruched fabric to the lining before like this:


However, after much experimentation, I decided that the best option was to apply the outer layer directly to the lining.

 

In another ill-fated "sounded good at the time" idea, I thought I might need a little more seam allowance on the outer layer, so I added bias binding all the way around.
I figured that I might need a little extra seam allowance to deal with the added bulk from the boning on the lining layer and the  muslin interlining on the outer layer. 


all bias binding, all the time
In the end, I didn't need any extra seam allowance and the bias binding just seemed to get in the way. I ended up trimming most of it off.


This finish in consistent with the original that I was copying, but I'm not sure that makes me feel any better about it.


Also, in a fit of perverse drive for "period correctness", I decided to  hand bind the button holes. 

Finally, the bodice layers were attached to each other, and I was ready to start thinking about trimming the bodice.



After many different test drapes, I settled on a gold colored silk gorgette to make just a front drape. I was initially enamored of the chevon shaped drape on the back of the original, but I found that I couldn't get the proportions right to be flattering because I am so short waisted.


I wanted to use some of the teal fabric on the bodice, so that they looked like they really belonged together. Lastly, I wanted to create some sort of pouf-of-interest  to mimic the feather "thing" that sits at the lowest point of the front drape on the Worth gown.

I loosely followed this tutorial to make fabric "flowers" for the front of the bodice and the drape.



The last thing that I did was to make some trim from a contrasting brass fabric trimmed with tan lace. I pleated this fabric using the "fork trick" I found on the Truly Victorian website. I added this trim to the front of the underskirt and the lower portion of the train.





The full effect was truly achieved once I had it on at the World's Fair. I had friends help with the hair and make up. I have good and talented friends.







Finally, I was additionally motivated to complete this project in time for this event because Margaret (Magpie) Killjoy was going to be there making tintypes. You should really check out his stuff. It's amazing. We had seen his work at Steampunk Gettysburg, and I knew I really wanted one in a fabulous outfit. Here's what I got. I couldn't love it more:

Seriously. 

Monday, May 27, 2013

Steampunk Alice in Wonderland

This was the first time I really put together a costume as a recognizable character. A friend of mine wanted to do Steampunk Ariel as an excuse to make a swimming costume, so I said I'd play along.

I made the Laughing Moon drawers in white. I closed them at the crotch, as they would be visible in the costume. The drawers were pretty straight forward. It was my first time doing tucks, and I didn't do a great job, but they were wearable. I also made them a size too small (on purpose), but if I made them again, I would increase the size. As a wearing note, drawers are usually underneath the corset (as they needed to be for this costume). They are also usually covered by a chemise and several layers of skirts. If I make another pair of drawers to be worn as true underclothes, I will definitely make open drawers. It makes getting to the restroom and then getting back together again much easier.

I used the Simplicity Chemise pattern #9769, but I cut if off at hip length. I made the chemise in blue and I didn't want it to extend out from the corset in a visible way. This was straightforward enough. Somehow, the Simplicity pattern diagrams sometimes more confusion than they solve, but I got it done. Before I cut the neck line, I measured my shoulders about where I expected the chemise to fall. I know that I have narrow shoulders, but I cut the neck line about 3" shorter than my size otherwise called for. This is an important fitting step if you don't want the chemise falling down all the time.

I used the corset I made from the Laughing Moon Silverado pattern. I used the same blue fabric that I used on the chemise to help create the line of Alice's dress.

I also modified this 1950's style apron from Simplicity so that it only had one skirt layer. I liked it because I was round enough to get over the hoop skirt and had a big bow in the back for modesty.

The big effort for this costume was making a blue hoop skirt. I used Truly Victorian 142 (the Walking Cage Crinoline). This project was more time consuming that it would be for most people because I needed it to be in a periwinkle blue. That meant that I couldn't use standard, pre-made hoop casing. Instead I used grosgrain ribbon wrapped on both side with strips of my fabric. This providing a casing for the hoops and a study surface to attach the vertical strips to. Additionally, I just used a regular waist band instead of the boned, laced belt. I used a strip of Velcro to hold it on, but I found that in a crowded hallway, it was better to supplement it with a safety pin.

The hoop skirt was tedious and I spent a lot of time fine tuning the balance of the hoops. I think if this had been intended strictly for undergarment use, things would have gone a lot faster and I could have fussed less.

Here's photos of the hoop skirt & apron:



And here are some of me in the full outfit:



These are totally awesome Tavistock boots from American Duchess

This cracks me up! That's my husband is his totally rad Vader Lord of the Pith costume. We make a cute couple.